Purpose of the Bill of Rights

The Constitution drafted in 1787 created a stronger national government but contained few express guarantees of individual liberty. During ratification, Anti-Federalists warned that broad federal powers might be used against speech, religion, property, and criminal defendants. Federalists replied that the national government possessed only delegated powers, yet several states ratified while recommending amendments. James Madison drew on those proposals, and the first ten amendments became effective in 1791. The Bill of Rights therefore served both a legal and a political purpose: it placed specific limits on government and helped fulfill a promise that secured support for the new Constitution.

Read the focused lesson

Civil liberties versus civil rights

The terms sound interchangeable, but they direct attention to different constitutional problems. A civil liberty protects a sphere of individual freedom against improper government interference. Freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, protection from unreasonable searches, and the right to counsel are familiar examples. A civil right protects equal legal status, access, or participation. Voting rights, equal access to public accommodations, and protection against unlawful discrimination are common examples. A useful first question is therefore: Is the claimant asking government to leave a protected choice alone, or asking the law to provide equal treatment?

Read the focused lesson

Application of the Bill of Rights to the states

The original Bill of Rights answered a specific fear: the new national government might abuse the powers granted to it. Its commands therefore restrained federal officials. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court rejected a wharf owner's effort to use the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause against a city. Baltimore might have faced duties under state law, but the federal Bill of Rights did not yet supply the rule. This is the starting point for every state-and-local rights question.

Read the focused lesson

Fourteenth Amendment

Ratified after the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment changed the constitutional relationship among individuals, the states, and the national government. Its first section establishes national and state citizenship and then places three major limits on state action. The Privileges or Immunities Clause protects a comparatively narrow set of rights associated with national citizenship in modern doctrine. The Due Process Clause prevents states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Equal Protection Clause requires states to govern without constitutionally unjustified discrimination. These clauses belong to one amendment, but they do different work.

Read the focused lesson

Due Process Clause

The Constitution contains two Due Process Clauses with parallel language but different government targets. The Fifth Amendment restrains the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment restrains state and local government. A claimant should therefore identify the official before choosing the clause: a federal benefits agency points to the Fifth Amendment, while a state licensing board or city school system points to the Fourteenth. Both clauses forbid government from depriving a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

Read the focused lesson

Selective incorporation

Selective incorporation describes the Supreme Court's provision-by-provision method of deciding which Bill of Rights guarantees are included within the liberty protected against state deprivation by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court did not incorporate the first eight amendments as a single package. Nor does selective mean that each state chooses which federal freedoms to honor. Selection occurs through constitutional adjudication, and an incorporated guarantee binds every state and locality.

Read the focused lesson

Substantive and procedural due process

A useful comparison asks what would happen if government supplied a perfect hearing. If reliable evidence, advance notice, and a neutral decision maker could cure the complaint, the claim is procedural. If the claimant argues that government may not impose the restriction even after flawless procedures, the claim is substantive. This thought experiment identifies the nature of the objection before case names or standards distract from it.

Read the focused lesson

Second Amendment

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. District of Columbia v. Heller recognized a right to possess a handgun for self-defense in the home, and McDonald v. Chicago applied that protection to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment. The right is not unlimited: a law may regulate arms without violating the Amendment, but the government must justify a covered restriction under the governing historical framework.

Read the focused lesson

Other Bill of Rights protections

Several less frequently tested provisions complete the Bill of Rights. The Third Amendment restricts quartering soldiers in private homes. The Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause generally requires just compensation when government takes private property for public use. The Seventh Amendment preserves jury trial in covered federal civil cases. The Ninth warns that listing some rights does not deny others retained by the people, and the Tenth reserves undelegated powers to the states or the people.

Read the focused lesson

Chapter video