Gerrymandering
CLEP American Government, Chapter 7
Gerrymandering
Gerrymandering draws districts to advantage a party, group, or incumbent, commonly through packing or cracking. Federal courts treat racial and partisan claims differently; excessive race-based design can trigger equal-protection review.
Packing concentrates opposing voters in a small number of districts they win by large margins; cracking divides them among several districts where they remain minorities. Both can produce a seat distribution different from the statewide vote, although geography and electoral concentration can create similar patterns without intentional manipulation.
Legal treatment depends on the basis of the claim. Federal courts have held partisan-gerrymandering claims nonjusticiable under the federal Constitution, while racial gerrymandering remains subject to equal-protection review and state constitutions may regulate partisan line drawing. Do not collapse partisan advantage and race predominance into one doctrine.
A strange shape can be evidence but is not the legal definition. Examine intent, voter placement, traditional districting criteria, and alternatives. A compact map can still pack voters, and an irregular boundary can follow geography or comply with a voting-rights obligation rather than serve a partisan plan.
Video lesson: Gerrymandering: Crash Course Government and Politics #37
Related to This Article
More math articles
- 6th Grade OAA Math Worksheets: FREE & Printable
- How to Solve Word Problems of Dividing Big Numbers
- How to Solve Absolute Values and Opposites of Rational Numbers?
- 5th Grade ILEARN Math Worksheets: FREE & Printable
- Low-Temperature Sterilization Methods
- The Best Grade 3 ELA Practice Tests for Wyoming Students
- Number Properties Puzzle – Challenge 13
- Party caucuses and conferences
- A Comprehensive Collection of Free AFOQT Math Practice Tests
- How to Find the Slope of a Line: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide




















What people say about "Gerrymandering - Effortless Math"?
No one replied yet.