Bargaining and persuasion

Bargaining and persuasion

CLEP American Government, Chapter 11

Bargaining and persuasion

Separated institutions force presidents to bargain. Legislators control votes and chamber procedures; agencies hold expertise and implementation capacity; states and private actors may control cooperation needed for success. The presidency offers resources-agenda attention, information, appointments, campaign help, access, and the possibility of a veto-but those resources matter only when another actor values them. Persuasion is therefore relational, not a personal power to command agreement.

A president may trade policy concessions, adjust timing, promise to sign a compromise, help a member on another issue, or threaten a veto. Credibility is essential. A threat no one expects the president to carry out creates little leverage, while a narrow congressional margin can make one concession valuable. Members also answer to their own voters and parties, so national popularity may not move a pivotal legislator whose constituency opposes the president.

Suppose a senator supports infrastructure spending but objects to a labor provision. The president may accept narrower language, offer support for a separate state project, or mobilize public pressure. None of those actions changes the senator's legal freedom to vote no. If a compromise wins passage, the causal mechanism is coalition building, not a unilateral presidential decree.

Public appeals and private bargaining are related but different. Going public changes attention and electoral pressure; private negotiation changes the terms of exchange. Both can fail or backfire. On an exam, identify the target, the resource offered, and the behavior that must change. Do not infer successful persuasion from speeches or meetings alone.

Video lesson: Presidential Power: Crash Course Government and Politics #11

Related to This Article

What people say about "Bargaining and persuasion - Effortless Math"?

No one replied yet.

Leave a Reply