Patronage and the spoils system

Patronage and the spoils system

CLEP American Government, Chapter 13

Patronage and the spoils system

Patronage means distributing government positions or benefits partly to reward political supporters. The historical spoils system treated many public jobs as prizes belonging to the party that won an election. Supporters argued that rotation in office prevented a permanent elite and allowed the winning party to implement its program. In practice, the system often made party loyalty more important than administrative competence.

The mechanism tied party organization to employment. Candidates and party leaders mobilized voters, and a victorious administration replaced many officeholders with loyal supporters. Those employees might then contribute time or money to the party that controlled their jobs. The arrangement strengthened parties, but frequent turnover erased expertise and created pressure to serve partisan patrons rather than the public.

Criticism grew as federal responsibilities became larger and more technical. A customs office, postal operation, or financial bureau could not reliably function if experienced workers were routinely dismissed after elections. Patronage also created opportunities for corruption because an officeholder could view the position as a reward to exploit rather than a public trust. Reformers therefore pressed for competitive examinations and protection of covered career positions.

Merit reform reduced the spoils system but did not remove politics from administration. Presidents still appoint agency leaders and other policymakers so that elections can influence government. That is not automatically patronage: a political appointment can be based on policy responsibility, competence, and constitutional design. Patronage is most clearly present when party service itself supplies the decisive employment reason.

Worked scenario. After an election, a party leader demands that a qualified career records manager be dismissed so a campaign fundraiser can receive the salary. The job is technical, and the replacement lacks relevant experience. The decisive fact is reward for party service, so the pattern is patronage. If the president instead selects a qualified policy adviser for a position designed to change with administrations, the scenario describes political appointment rather than the classic spoils system.

Ask what the job requires and why the person received it. Loyalty tied to a continuing career position points toward patronage; qualifications under competitive rules point toward merit; leadership of the elected administration points toward a political appointment.

Video lesson: Bureaucracy Basics: Crash Course Government and Politics #15

Related to This Article

What people say about "Patronage and the spoils system - Effortless Math"?

No one replied yet.

Leave a Reply