George H. W. Bush, the Persian Gulf War, and the Post-Cold War Order
CLEP History of the United States II, Chapter 16
Bush managed the Soviet collapse cautiously
George H. W. Bush entered office as communist governments fell across Eastern Europe. He avoided triumphal rhetoric, supported German reunification within NATO, and worked with Mikhail Gorbachev on arms reductions. The Berlin Wall's opening did not itself dissolve the Soviet Union; internal republican movements, economic crisis, reform, and the failed 1991 coup drove that process.
Panama displayed post-Cold War intervention
In December 1989, American forces invaded Panama, removed Manuel Noriega, and installed the elected government whose victory Noriega had nullified. The administration cited protection of Americans, treaty obligations, democracy, and drug trafficking. Critics challenged sovereignty, civilian casualties, and the breadth of force. The operation was not authorized by a new declaration of war or a United Nations coalition.
Iraq's invasion created a collective-security test
Saddam Hussein's Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Bush built a multinational coalition and obtained United Nations resolutions, sanctions, and congressional authorization. Operation Desert Shield defended Saudi Arabia; Operation Desert Storm expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991. The coalition's stated mandate was liberation of Kuwait, not occupation of Baghdad and regime change.
The war displayed new military and media arrangements
Air power, precision-guided weapons, satellite navigation, and rapid ground maneuver produced a short conventional campaign. The Pentagon used press pools and controlled access, contrasting with the freer but still imperfect reporting associated with Vietnam. Televised briefings highlighted precise strikes while leaving civilian effects and infrastructure damage harder to assess. Victory in a bounded campaign did not prove every future intervention would be quick.
The aftermath exposed the limits of the mandate
Bush encouraged Iraqis to rise but did not send coalition forces to protect Kurdish and Shiite rebellions initially. Iraqi forces crushed uprisings; later no-fly zones protected parts of the population. Sanctions and inspections sought to contain weapons programs. Leaving Saddam in power followed the coalition mandate and fear of occupation, but it created a continuing security problem.
A new world order remained contested
Bush described an order in which aggression met collective response through international institutions. The United States possessed unmatched military power, yet civil war, ethnic cleansing, failed states, and humanitarian crises did not fit a simple interstate model. Somalia, Bosnia, and Rwanda would show the difficulty of choosing when sovereignty, human rights, alliance interests, and domestic support justified action.
Base closings redistributed the peace dividend
The Base Realignment and Closure process closed or reduced installations after the Cold War. National savings and military restructuring imposed concentrated costs on towns dependent on payroll, contracts, and housing demand. Communities converted some bases to civilian uses, but adjustment varied. The same policy could be efficient nationally and disruptive locally.
The Gulf mobilization made the Reserve visible at home
Johnson avoided a large Reserve call-up when he escalated in Vietnam, relying instead on conscription and the active force; a call-up would have made the war's social cost more visible. After the draft ended, planners placed important transport, medical, supply, and other capabilities in the Guard and Reserve so a major operation would require their activation. More than a quarter-million reservists and Guard members were called for the 1990-1991 Gulf crisis. The contrast helps explain why Gulf mobilization reached civilian employers and communities differently from Vietnam-era draft calls.
Arms control survived the end of superpower rivalry
The first Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, signed in 1991, required deep reductions and verification of deployed strategic weapons. After the Soviet Union dissolved, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine had to address weapons and treaty obligations inherited from one state. Cooperative threat-reduction programs helped secure and dismantle materials. Verification made reductions observable enough to sustain cooperation during political upheaval. The post-Cold War settlement therefore required inspections, finance, and diplomacy as well as declarations that the rivalry had ended.
War powers operated through overlapping forms of authority
Bush first deployed forces to defend Saudi Arabia, then sought and received a January 1991 congressional authorization to use force after United Nations deadlines expired. The vote was not a formal declaration of war, yet it supplied specific statutory support beyond the president's claim of commander-in-chief power. That sequence matters when comparing the Gulf War with Panama or later interventions. International authorization, congressional authorization, and presidential command answer different legal and political questions. A coalition can possess a United Nations mandate without settling domestic constitutional debate, just as a congressional vote does not require every ally to accept the operation.
The oil shock briefly joined foreign policy to recession politics
Iraq's invasion pushed oil prices upward and weakened consumer confidence while the American economy was already slowing. The 1990-1991 recession also reflected tight credit, overbuilding, and the savings-and-loan crisis; it cannot be reduced to the Gulf emergency alone. By the 1992 election, recovery had begun, but employment and household confidence lagged. Bush's high approval after the war therefore did not guarantee reelection. Voters could approve a bounded military campaign while judging domestic economic management more harshly. This is a useful check against explanations that treat presidential popularity as one permanent score rather than a response to changing issues and time horizons.
Modeled reasoning: measure success against the authorized objective
A coalition liberates an invaded country but leaves the aggressor's regime in place.
Watch the history in motion
This short lesson adds voices, images, and chronology to the ideas you just studied.
Video: George HW Bush and the End of the Cold War: Crash Course US History #44, CrashCourse.
Try four CLEP-style questions
- Why did coalition forces stop short of occupying Baghdad in 1991?
- The Soviet Union assumed command of the coalition after Kuwait's liberation.
- Iraq had withdrawn before the air campaign and accepted an internationally supervised political transition in Baghdad.
- Congress prohibited all operations outside American territorial waters.
- The mandate centered on liberating Kuwait, and occupation threatened coalition unity and high costs.
- United Nations resolutions required Saddam Hussein to lead a democratic transition.
- What did press pools in the Gulf War do?
- They gave selected reporters controlled access rather than unrestricted movement across the battlefield.
- They transferred targeting and operational-security decisions from military commanders to participating television network executives.
- They prohibited the military from reviewing any information before broadcast.
- They required every journalist to serve as an enlisted combat correspondent.
- They ended daily Pentagon briefings and satellite transmission of war coverage.
- Why could base closure be nationally efficient but locally damaging?
- Federal law prevented communities from converting former military property to commercial, educational, or transportation uses.
- Federal conversion assistance replaced the lost military payroll with comparable civilian employment at each closed base.
- Savings were dispersed nationally while job, contract, and property losses concentrated near a base.
- Military towns received no federal payroll or contractor spending before closure.
- The process expanded every installation while reducing total defense spending.
- Which statement best describes Bush's handling of German reunification?
- He transferred reunification authority exclusively to the United Nations General Assembly.
- He opposed reunification and demanded permanent restoration of the Berlin Wall.
- He required a unified Germany to leave NATO and enter a new neutral Central European security bloc.
- He recognized East Germany as permanent after the Soviet Union dissolved.
- He supported reunification within NATO while negotiating carefully with European and Soviet leaders.
Check your answers and reasoning
Independent preparation. CLEP is a registered trademark of the College Board, which does not endorse this lesson.
Related to This Article
More math articles
- Economic and noneconomic groups
- Full-Length TASC Math Practice Test-Answers and Explanations
- 3rd Grade Scantron Math Worksheets: FREE & Printable
- CLEP College Math FREE Sample Practice Questions
- The Ultimate Regents Algebra 1 Course (+FREE Worksheets)
- GED Math Test-Taking Strategies
- Biological Macromolecules
- The Intermediate Value Theorem
- Expansion of equality through legislation and judicial interpretation
- The Best Worksheets for Florida Grade 2 Students
What people say about "George H. W. Bush, the Persian Gulf War, and the Post-Cold War Order - Effortless Math"?
No one replied yet.