The Postwar Problem: Lincoln, Johnson, and Competing Reconstructions
CLEP History of the United States II, Chapter 1
A victory without a settlement
In April 1865, Union armies had defeated the Confederacy, but military victory did not answer the political questions created by emancipation. Eleven states had claimed to leave the Union, much of the South's infrastructure was damaged, and nearly four million formerly enslaved people were testing what freedom could mean. Death and injury also distorted Southern households: the war left an unusual number of widows and disabled veterans, and several impoverished states later spent scarce revenue on artificial limbs. Who could restore a state to the Union? Which branch of the federal government would set the terms? Would former Confederates quickly regain power? Most important, would emancipation produce only the legal end of slavery or also enforceable civil and political rights? Reconstruction was the contested process of answering those questions, not simply the physical rebuilding of the South.
Lincoln's wartime approach
Abraham Lincoln treated secession as the action of disloyal individuals rather than the lawful destruction of states. His December 1863 Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction offered most Confederates a pardon after an oath of loyalty and allowed a new state government when loyal voters equal to 10 percent of the state's 1860 electorate had taken the oath. The Ten Percent Plan was deliberately lenient: Lincoln hoped to weaken the Confederacy and create loyal governments while war continued. It required acceptance of emancipation but did not guarantee Black suffrage. Because it was an executive wartime initiative, it also provoked a constitutional dispute over whether Congress or the president controlled restoration.
Congress proposes a stricter route
Republicans in Congress feared that a small loyal minority could restore the planter elite without protecting freedpeople. The Wade-Davis Bill of 1864 required a majority of white male citizens in a former Confederate state to take an oath that they had never voluntarily supported the rebellion before forming a government. It also demanded stronger safeguards for emancipation. Lincoln prevented the bill from becoming law with a pocket veto. The contrast matters: Lincoln emphasized rapid reunion and presidential discretion; Wade-Davis embodied congressional control and a harder loyalty test. Neither proposal by itself created racial equality, but their conflict forecast the institutional struggle that followed the war.
Johnson's restoration program
After Lincoln's assassination, Andrew Johnson inherited Reconstruction. A Tennessee Unionist and Democrat placed on the Republican ticket in 1864, Johnson despised wealthy planters yet held deeply racist views and favored white control of Southern politics. In May 1865 he offered pardons to most former Confederates, while wealthy property holders and leading officials could apply to him personally. Provisional governors organized conventions that repealed secession ordinances, repudiated Confederate debts, and ratified the Thirteenth Amendment. Johnson did not require Black voting rights. His numerous individual pardons soon allowed many former Confederate leaders and planters to recover property and political influence.
The clash becomes visible
Southern elections in 1865 sent prominent former Confederates to public office, and state legislatures enacted Black Codes that restricted freedpeople's movement and labor. When Congress assembled in December, its Republican majority refused to seat many Southern representatives. The immediate constitutional basis was Article I, Section 5: each chamber judges the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members. Congress then created the Joint Committee on Reconstruction and investigated conditions in the South. In 1866 Johnson vetoed both an extension of the Freedmen's Bureau and the Civil Rights Act; Congress overrode him on the civil-rights measure and later on a new Bureau bill. This sequence transformed disagreement into a constitutional confrontation: was restoration finished because the president said so, or could Congress demand protections before recognizing representation?
Three competing meanings of reunion
Moderate Republicans generally sought loyal state governments and basic civil equality, while Radical Republicans such as Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner argued that Congress should remake Southern institutions and protect Black political power. Johnson wanted quick restoration with limited federal intervention and no federal guarantee of Black suffrage. Southern white Unionists, former Confederates, and freedpeople added further agendas. Freedpeople held conventions, petitioned officials, built institutions, and demanded land, education, family autonomy, legal equality, and voting rights. The debate therefore cannot be reduced to a two-person argument: different groups agreed that the war was over but disagreed over who belonged to the reconstructed polity.
Modeled reasoning: follow the evidence
A question may present the Ten Percent Plan and Johnson's pardons as evidence of continuity.
Chronology and a common trap
Keep the order straight: Lincoln announced the Ten Percent Plan in 1863; Congress passed Wade-Davis in 1864; Lincoln was assassinated in April 1865; Johnson launched restoration in May; Southern Black Codes and elections followed in 1865; Congress challenged him in 1866; and congressional, or Radical, Reconstruction began with the Reconstruction Acts in 1867. The Supreme Court later resolved part of the status question in Texas v. White (1869): Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase described the Constitution as creating an "indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States" and treated Texas's secession ordinance as absolutely null. A common misconception is that Lincoln's leniency proves he would have followed Johnson's entire course. Lincoln's assassination makes that counterfactual unknowable. What the record supports is narrower: Lincoln favored flexible reunion, but shortly before his death he publicly considered limited Black suffrage for educated men and Black veterans.
Modeled reasoning: distinguish legal freedom from practical access
A state repeals a slave code, but local officials refuse to enforce labor contracts for freedpeople.
Watch the history in motion
This short lesson adds voices, images, and chronology to the ideas you just studied.
Video: RECONSTRUCTION [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 10] Period 5: 1844-1877, Heimler's History.
Try four CLEP-style questions
- Which feature most clearly characterized Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan?
- It required a majority of white male citizens to swear that they had not voluntarily supported the rebellion before a state convention could begin.
- It permitted a state government to form after loyal voters equal to 10 percent of the 1860 electorate took an oath.
- It divided former Confederate states into military districts and registered Black male voters.
- It made ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment a condition of congressional representation.
- It required wealthy former Confederates to seek individual presidential pardons before recovering political influence.
- Why did congressional Republicans refuse to accept Johnson's claim that Reconstruction was complete in late 1865?
- They concluded that secession had permanently converted the former states into federal territories.
- They objected that Johnson had conditioned pardons on Black male suffrage.
- Black Codes and the return of former Confederate leaders suggested that emancipation lacked protection.
- They wanted restoration completed under Lincoln's wartime 10-percent threshold without any congressional role.
- They regarded ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment as unconstitutional without former Confederate votes in Congress.
- Which statement best distinguishes Moderate from Radical Republican goals during Reconstruction?
- Moderates generally sought loyal governments and basic civil equality, while Radicals pressed for deeper institutional change and protection of Black political power.
- Moderates demanded immediate confiscation of plantations and permanent military rule, while Radicals made presidential pardons the sole test of national loyalty and state restoration.
- Moderates favored permanent territorial status for the South, while Radicals sought rapid readmission under former Confederate leaders.
- Moderates and Radicals proposed identical terms but disagreed only over which committee should administer them.
- Moderates accepted Johnson's restored governments without further safeguards, while Radicals opposed national civil-rights legislation.
- Which sequence is chronologically correct?
- Ten Percent Plan; Lincoln's assassination; Wade-Davis Bill; Johnson's restoration program
- Wade-Davis Bill; Ten Percent Plan; Johnson's restoration program; Lincoln's assassination
- Lincoln's assassination; Johnson's restoration program; Ten Percent Plan; Black Codes
- Ten Percent Plan; Wade-Davis Bill; Lincoln's assassination; Johnson's restoration program
- Wade-Davis Bill; Johnson's restoration program; Lincoln's assassination; congressional Reconstruction
Check your answers and reasoning
Independent preparation. CLEP is a registered trademark of the College Board, which does not endorse this lesson.
Related to This Article
More math articles
- 10 Most Common 6th Grade ACT Aspire Math Questions
- How to Solve Measurement Word Problems
- Judicial Review and the Role of the Courts
- Make the Number — Reach the Target (24-style Game)
- The Best Grade 4 ELA Practice Tests for Wisconsin Students
- Interference, Diffraction, and Polarization
- How to Compare Money Amounts
- CLEP U.S. History I 025: Townshend Duties, Boston, and Nonimportation
- ACCUPLACER Math Practice Test Questions
- 7th Grade SBAC Math Practice Test Questions
What people say about "The Postwar Problem: Lincoln, Johnson, and Competing Reconstructions - Effortless Math"?
No one replied yet.