Approval is easy evidence; equal protection under pressure is harder. The relevant test asks whether the same forum and procedure remain available when officials or citizens despise the speaker.

Name the group and the conduct. A peaceful rally tests tolerance, while threats, violence, or obstruction may be regulated under neutral rules without establishing viewpoint discrimination.

Tolerance is tested when the protected speaker or organization is unpopular, not when the observer agrees with it. The value protects lawful expression and participation, not violence or immunity from criticism. Because answers change with the named group and described conduct, research should distinguish principled limits from selective willingness to silence a disliked opponent. A respondent who supports free speech in the abstract but would ban a peaceful rally by the group he dislikes most displays a tolerance gap. By contrast, opposing threats or property destruction does not necessarily show intolerance because the objection concerns conduct outside the protected peaceful activity.

Video lesson: Political Ideology: Crash Course Government and Politics #35