Choose the best answer, check your reasoning, and use the explanation to correct any gap.
All questions and explanations are available below. Turn on JavaScript for instant scoring.
Question 1 of 4
A. Disparate impact alone does not establish an equal-protection violation
A facially neutral policy does not violate equal protection based on disparate impact alone; the constitutional claim also requires discriminatory governmental purpose. Other statutes may address effects without that showing.
Question 2 of 4
B. The denial can fail rational-basis review because bare prejudice is not a legitimate purpose
Disability classifications ordinarily receive rational-basis review, but that test still requires a legitimate governmental purpose and a rational connection to the rule. Unsupported hostility or fear does not by itself justify treating an otherwise comparable group home differently.
Question 3 of 4
C. Strict scrutiny because the law contains an express racial classification
An express governmental racial classification triggers strict scrutiny without a separate search for hidden discriminatory purpose or personal hostility. Equal facilities, local control of education, and the absence of personal animus do not reduce the standard to intermediate or rational-basis review.
Question 4 of 4
D. The sex classification relies on a broad role stereotype rather than an important objective substantially related to the classification
Sex classifications ordinarily receive intermediate scrutiny, which rejects broad assumptions about the roles or preferences of men and women. Statistical generalizations cannot substitute for the required substantial relationship to an important objective.