Choose the best answer, check your reasoning, and use the explanation to correct any gap.
All questions and explanations are available below. Turn on JavaScript for instant scoring.
Question 1 of 4
C. State allocation rules can produce different popular-vote and electoral-vote winners
The nationwide total measures national support, while electoral votes are awarded from state outcomes under state allocation rules. A disagreement between those totals does not trigger a contingent election; the House acts only when no candidate receives an electoral majority.
Question 2 of 4
D. Its electoral votes have high tipping potential because they could supply the majority
The campaign is ten electoral votes short, so the tied state's twelve-vote bloc could be pivotal in reaching a majority. National popular-vote gains, down-ballot effects, cheaper contact, and defensive insurance can all matter strategically, but the stem supplies no evidence that those considerations outweigh the tied state's immediate tipping potential.
Question 3 of 4
A. A party may formally complete the two nominations through different cycle-specific convention procedures
Formal nomination follows the convention procedures adopted for the relevant party and cycle. Those rules may authorize a remote or preconvention presidential ballot and a separate vice-presidential method. The remote presidential vote does not automatically complete the vice-presidential choice, and a recommendation has formal effect only through the procedure the rules provide.
Question 4 of 4
B. The House, with one vote for each state delegation
The House chooses from the top three presidential electoral-vote recipients, and each state delegation casts one vote. The Senate separately chooses the vice president from the top two vice-presidential recipients. A joint-session count does not become the contingent ballot.