Choose the best answer, check your reasoning, and use the explanation to correct any gap.
All questions and explanations are available below. Turn on JavaScript for instant scoring.
Question 1 of 4
C. agenda setting
By making zoning the lead, the newspaper directs audience attention toward that part of the report. That is agenda setting. The content of the later explanation could frame zoning in competing ways, a related but distinct function.
Question 2 of 4
C. Framing, because different emphases changed how respondents interpreted identical information
A frame makes one consideration within an issue especially prominent. Random assignment, identical facts, and different emphases isolate presentation as the source of the changed interpretation. The study does not measure issue ranking, mayoral evaluation, voluntary source choice, or political action.
Question 3 of 4
D. Investigative journalism and the watchdog role
Comparing internal records with independently generated test results develops original evidence that the agency had not assembled for public view, which is investigative journalism. Making the omission visible so an authorized oversight body can respond serves the press's watchdog role. Agenda setting would require evidence that the issue gained public importance; gatekeeping and routine selection concern which available material enters the news; explanatory reporting and framing do not capture the newsroom's original testing and the resulting accountability chain.
Question 4 of 4
A. agenda setting, because coverage changed the issue's perceived importance
Agenda setting changes an issue's perceived importance. The rise in housing's most-important-problem ranking, combined with stable policy preferences, fits increased salience rather than persuasion; the scenario does not measure a frame, an evaluation criterion, or self-selected exposure.