Choose the best answer, check your reasoning, and use the explanation to correct any gap.
All questions and explanations are available below. Turn on JavaScript for instant scoring.
Question 1 of 4
B. Conditional spending, because the state accepts funds tied to stated program-related terms
Conditional spending encourages state action through terms attached to voluntarily accepted federal funds. It differs from commandeering, which directly orders states to enact or administer a federal program, and from preemption, which displaces conflicting state law. Compliance costs do not turn an accepted funding condition into an unfunded mandate.
Question 2 of 4
C. a block grant because recipients choose among broadly authorized uses
Block grants fund a broad policy area and leave recipients meaningful discretion among authorized uses. Categorical grants define narrower purposes, while formula and project describe methods of distribution rather than the breadth of permissible uses. General revenue sharing lacks the program boundary that remains here.
Question 3 of 4
D. devolution, because responsibility and discretion move toward the states
Devolution transfers policymaking, administration, or financing responsibility from the national government toward state or local governments. The stem describes all three. Cooperative federalism and fiscal federalism may describe continuing relationships between levels, but neither identifies this direction of transfer; preemption generally displaces state law with national law.
Question 4 of 4
A. An unfunded mandate
An unfunded mandate imposes duties without corresponding federal financing. Such mandates can shift implementation costs to state or local governments.