Choose the best answer, check your reasoning, and use the explanation to correct any gap.
All questions and explanations are available below. Turn on JavaScript for instant scoring.
Question 1 of 4
B. natural rights
Natural rights are moral claims understood to belong to persons independently of recognition by a particular government. Legal rights, by contrast, depend on recognition and enforcement within a legal system. Popular sovereignty concerns the source of political authority, not the source of an individual moral claim.
Question 2 of 4
C. A people may alter or abolish a government that persistently destroys the rights it was created to secure
The Declaration argues that governments exist to secure rights, derive just powers from consent, and may be altered or abolished when a sustained course of abuse makes them destructive of those ends. It does not require direct and unanimous approval of each law, assign unlimited sovereignty to colonial assemblies, accept parliamentary supremacy as the measure of legitimate rule, or claim that inherited legal rights automatically created a new national government.
Question 3 of 4
D. Popular sovereignty identifies the people as the ultimate source of authority, while representative government describes a principal way that authority is exercised
Popular sovereignty answers the source question: legitimate authority ultimately originates with the people. Representative government answers an institutional question: citizens ordinarily choose officials who deliberate and make policy on their behalf. Representation can express popular sovereignty without requiring direct voting on every measure.
Question 4 of 4
A. The government may have forfeited legitimacy by persistently defeating the purposes for which political authority was entrusted
Lockean social-contract theory makes authority conditional on the purposes for which it was entrusted. A sustained pattern of arbitrary imprisonment, self-serving confiscation, and cancellation of elections supports the conclusion that the government has attacked those purposes and may have forfeited legitimacy. Original authorization does not excuse every later abuse, and the theory addresses political obligation even apart from a court judgment. At the same time, one disputed burden on property would not by itself establish the sustained breach described here.