What you will be able to do
classify a source in relation to a question; identify a source’s possibilities and limits; combine source types for a fuller account
How do primary and secondary sources answer different historical questions?
classify a source in relation to a question; identify a source’s possibilities and limits; combine source types for a fuller account
Choose a historical event. Name one source created during it and one later source that might explain it
A primary source connects directly to the period, event, or participant under study. Letters, laws, maps, tools, buildings, photographs, and oral histories can be primary, but age alone does not determine the category. A secondary source interprets evidence after the event. Historians select, compare, and explain primary sources to build an account. Secondary sources can provide context and synthesis; primary sources can provide direct traces and perspectives

A diary may show one person’s observations but not everyone present. A law states an official rule but does not prove the rule was followed. An artifact reveals materials and use, yet its meaning may remain uncertain without archaeological or documentary context. Combining sources strengthens inquiry. If a map, letter, and later study agree on a location, confidence may grow. If they conflict, do not average them; investigate authorship, purpose, timing, and additional evidence. For example, a factory rulebook can establish what managers ordered, workers’ letters can describe how rules felt in practice, and a historian can connect those records to wider labor patterns. Using all three does not guarantee certainty, but it makes the conclusion more transparent and helps readers see which source supports each part

Primary does not mean perfectly accurate, and secondary does not mean less valuable. Judge each source by the question, context, evidence, and limits
For every source, write one supported possibility and one honest limitation before using it as evidence
A participant saw from one position, remembered selectively, and may have had a purpose. Eyewitness evidence still requires context and comparison
For an approved local event, choose one object or image, one written primary source, and one secondary account. Explain the job of each
Source type depends on its relationship to the inquiry. Primary sources provide direct evidence; secondary sources interpret evidence; both require contextual analysis and comparison
Work through all 10 questions. Open an answer only after you have written or explained your response.
Primary, because it was created during the reaction being studied
Secondary, because it later interprets evidence about 1789
Classification depends on the source’s relationship to the question. An old book may interpret an earlier event, and a new source may document the present period being studied
A law shows an official rule or policy; by itself it cannot prove enforcement, compliance, or lived effects
The triangle should name an inquiry and three relevant, different sources whose contributions are explained
Materials, technology, craft, wear, use, trade, status, or daily practice, provided the claim matches context
It represents one remembered perspective; comparison can check dates, add context, and reveal other experiences
Ask who created each source, when relative to the event, what evidence it used, and what purpose or audience shaped it
It can synthesize many sources, establish context, explain debate, and present an evidence-based interpretation
Answers vary; the relationship to a named question must correctly support the classification