What you will be able to do
write a focused claim that answers a question; select relevant evidence and explain the connection; quote, paraphrase, and cite sources accurately
How can a researcher make a clear claim, support it with evidence, and credit every source?
write a focused claim that answers a question; select relevant evidence and explain the connection; quote, paraphrase, and cite sources accurately
Read a fictional park question and three facts. Point to the fact that most directly helps answer the question and explain why
A claim directly answers the research question. It should be specific enough to test and cautious enough to fit the evidence. ‘The route improved library access for many surveyed riders’ is stronger than ‘The route solved every transportation problem.’ The second claim goes beyond the evidence and ignores people not represented in the survey. Evidence must be accurate, relevant, and sufficient. Attendance numbers are relevant to library use, while an unrelated weather fact is not. Reasoning explains the link: visits increased after the stop opened, and riders named the stop as helpful. Timing alone does not prove cause, so the researcher should consider other changes such as new library hours

A quotation copies exact words and uses quotation marks. Quote only when the wording itself matters, and include enough context to preserve the meaning. A paraphrase restates an idea in genuinely new wording and structure. Changing a few words is not a true paraphrase and can distort the source. Citation gives readers a path back to the source. Record creator, title, date, publisher or collection, and stable location as you work. A citation does not make weak evidence strong; it makes the evidence traceable. Follow the citation style assigned by the teacher consistently, and never invent missing author, date, page, or quotation information

After every piece of evidence, explain what it shows, why it matters, and what it cannot establish alone
Join claim and evidence with because, then add reasoning. If the sentence does not make sense, the evidence may be irrelevant or the claim may be too broad
A source list without clear links to claims leaves readers guessing. Cite at the point where evidence, wording, data, or an idea enters the work
Using a teacher-provided data table, rider comment, and source cards, write one claim, two evidence sentences with citations, reasoning, and one limitation
A defensible conclusion answers the question with a focused claim, relevant evidence, clear reasoning, and appropriate limits. Accurate quotation, true paraphrase, and complete citations make the research traceable and honest
Work through all 10 questions. Open an answer only after you have written or explained your response.
The route improved access for many surveyed riders
Library visits and rider reports
The diagram should show a claim supported by evidence with reasoning as the explicit connection
The timing and increase are consistent with improved access, especially with rider reports, but other changes such as hours, programs, or population could also affect visits
Examples: only surveyed riders are represented; not every resident uses the library; the survey method may miss some people; other changes may affect attendance
Both a quotation and a paraphrase
Any four appropriate details: creator, title, date, publisher or collection, page or item number, URL, or access date when required
Quotation: exact source words in quotation marks. Paraphrase: the source idea in genuinely new wording and structure. Both are cited
It is too close to the original wording and it fails to credit the source. It may also change the meaning
Example claim: ‘The new path appears designed to improve physical accessibility.’ Reasoning: width, slope, and user testing are relevant design evidence, though actual use and maintenance should also be evaluated