What you will be able to do
check creator, date, purpose, and evidence; identify a source’s perspective; compare sources before making a conclusion
How can we judge whether a source is useful and understand its perspective?
check creator, date, purpose, and evidence; identify a source’s perspective; compare sources before making a conclusion
If two signs give different closing times for a museum, name one detail you would check before choosing which to follow
Credibility is not a sticker that says a source is always trustworthy. An official transit schedule is strong evidence for today’s bus times, but it may be weak evidence for why riders like a route. A rider survey could help with experiences, while agency records could help with schedules and costs. Check who created the source, when, for what purpose, and with what evidence. Expertise should match the claim. A bridge engineer may know bridge design, but that expertise does not automatically make the engineer an expert on every part of community history

Every source has a perspective because every creator has a position, experience, and purpose. Perspective can shape which facts are noticed or left out. It does not automatically make a source dishonest. Researchers ask what the perspective helps reveal and what else is needed. Corroboration means comparing sources. Agreement can strengthen a detail, while disagreement becomes a question to investigate. Two sources may use different dates, boundaries, or definitions, so first check whether they are truly describing the same thing. For instance, a construction notice and a resident’s account can both be credible while answering different questions: the notice establishes the official plan, and the account documents one lived effect

Always finish the judgment: ‘This source is more credible for ____ because ____.’ Avoid labeling an entire source simply good or bad
Ask two sharper questions: ‘Trust it for which claim?’ and ‘What evidence would let me check?’
Official records can be authoritative for laws, dates, or agency data while still leaving out lived experiences or past errors
Compare a current official park notice with an older visitor post. Judge each for opening hours, visitor experience, and recent construction. Explain which source fits each claim
Source credibility depends on the claim, creator, date, purpose, expertise, and evidence. Perspective shapes what a source reveals, and corroboration strengthens conclusions
Work through all 10 questions. Open an answer only after you have written or explained your response.
The library’s current official page
Creator, expertise, date, purpose, and evidence
Knowledge in one field does not prove knowledge about an unrelated claim
The user may notice curb cuts, path width, surface condition, or obstacles that affect access
No. Perspective shapes attention and interpretation but does not by itself prove a claim false
Compare sources to see where evidence agrees or differs
Accept date, scale, boundary, legend, source, projection, or whether both maps show the same place and purpose
The response must name the source and claim and support the judgment with creator or expertise, date, purpose, or evidence
Selling
It may omit lived experiences, use limited categories, reflect past errors, or answer only an official question