What you will be able to do
recognize a compelling question; write supporting questions that help answer it; explain why a question needs evidence
How do compelling and supporting questions work together in an inquiry?
recognize a compelling question; write supporting questions that help answer it; explain why a question needs evidence
Think of one question about a familiar public place. It may begin with who, what, where, when, why, or how
A compelling question matters to people and cannot be answered well with one fact. ‘Why do communities create public parks?’ invites us to consider recreation, nature, access, cost, and community needs. Different evidence-based answers may emphasize different purposes. A question is not compelling merely because it sounds dramatic. It should be understandable, researchable, and connected to social studies. Questions that assume an answer—such as ‘Why is our park perfect?’—should be revised so evidence can guide the conclusion

Researchers often begin with a question that is too large or unclear. They narrow a place, time, group, or idea. Instead of ‘How did everything change?’ a researcher might ask, ‘How did transportation in our town change between 1950 and today?’ Supporting questions should do different jobs. Some establish facts, some compare perspectives, and some explore causes or effects. Once the evidence is gathered, the researcher returns to the compelling question and builds a conclusion. For example, a park inquiry might combine an acreage fact, a comparison of user needs, and an explanation of funding choices. Together those answers address purpose more fully than any one detail

Use one meaningful compelling question and several smaller supporting questions. Each supporting question should help answer part of the larger one
Ask what understanding the question could add. Then use the ‘Can we investigate it?’ test. A meaningful question still needs possible sources
A factual question can be useful support, but a compelling question usually requires several facts, perspectives, and reasons
Choose a school, park, library, or transit stop. Write one compelling question and three supporting questions: one factual, one comparative, and one asking why or how
Compelling questions guide meaningful inquiries. Supporting questions divide the work into focused steps, and revision makes questions clearer and more researchable
Work through all 10 questions. Open an answer only after you have written or explained your response.
How does a river shape life in a community?
Accept a connected question, such as ‘How do people use the river for work, travel, or recreation?’
It assumes the town is best instead of allowing evidence to guide the answer
Accept a focused revision, such as ‘How has our school building changed since it opened?’
What community need did planners identify?
C: How has Main Street changed? S: Which buildings stood there in 1920?
Accept a map, schedule, photograph, government plan, observation, or interview with permission
Accept a clear comparison, such as ‘How do bus routes today differ from routes twenty years ago?’
They can supply different facts, causes, comparisons, or perspectives that together support a fuller answer
Return to the compelling question and answer with evidence